This diff resolves all known consistency issues with ASTableView and ASCollectionView.
It includes significantly more aggressive thrash-testing in ASTableViewStressTest,
which now passes on a variety of device and simulator configurations. It also updates
the unit tests run on every commit to ensure any regression is caught quickly.
A few of the salient changes in this diff:
- ASTableView now uses Rene's ASCollectionViewLayoutController, and actually uses a
UICollectionViewFlowLayout without any UICollectionView. This resolves an issue where
ASFlowLayoutController was generating slightly out-of-bounds indicies when programmatically
scrolling past the end of the table content. Because the custom implementation is likely
faster, I will revisit this later with profiling and possibly returning to the custom impl.
- There is now a second copy of the _nodes array maintained by ASDataController. It shares
the same node instances, but this does add some overhead to manipulating the arrays. I've
filed a task to follow up with optimization, as there are several great opportunities to
make it faster. However, I don't believe the overhead is a significant issue, and it does
guarantee correctness in even the toughest app usage scenarios.
- ASDataController no longer supports calling its delegate /before/ edit operations. No
other class was relying on this behavior, and it would be unusual for an app developer to
use ASDataController directly. However, it is possible that someone with a custom view
that integrates with ASDataController and ASRangeController could be affected by this.
- Further cleanup of organization, naming, additional comments, reduced code length
wherever possible. Overall, significantly more accessible to a new reader.
We can't get a freely configurable podspec to work reliably in all scenarios, so we push back for now and keep that in mind for a full SDK restructuring approach
- ASLayoutable requires mutable properties that are used when attached to a stack layout.
- Thus, ASLayoutable objects (including ASDisplayNode) can be injected into stack layout directly.
- ASStackLayoutNodeChild no longer needed.
- Tests and Kitten sample updated.
- Both ASDisplayNode and ASLayoutNode conforms to this protocol.
- ASDisplayNode can be embeded directly into layout graph.
- Eliminate ASCompositeNode.
- Fix ASStaticSizeDisplayNode not recpect min constrained size.
- Updated tests.
- ASRelativeSize and ASRelativeSizeRange are used only by ASStaticLayoutNode. They are declared in a standalone header.
- ASDimension contains a minimal set of new size types required to use the common layouts. Thus minimize the learning curve.
- Introduce ASLayoutNode and its subclasses.
- ASDisplayNode measures its ASLayoutNode and cache the result (ASLayout). Calculated size and position of each subnode can be retrieved from the calculated layout.
- Custom nodes need to override -layoutNodeThatFits:(CGSize) instead of -calculateSizeThatFits:(CGSize).
- Custom nodes do not need to layout its subnodes (in -layout:) anymore. ASDisplayNode can handle the job most of the time, by walking through its layout tree.
- ASCompositeNode is used to embed (display) subnodes to a node's layout. That way, each subnode will also be measured while the parent node is measuring. And the parent node knows where its subnodes are within its layout.
- The code is forked from LayoutComponents in ComponentKit.
- Public interfaces are modified to be strictly Objective-C. As a result, users are not forced to switch to Objective-C++, the linker can happily compile and Swift fans can continue using the mighty ASDK.
