Passing around a pointer was leading to crashes as the ASVC was the sole owner of the context. There are cases where the VC would dealloc while its subnodes were laying out. This could lead to the subnodes accessing a garbage pointer.
* Perhaps controversially, decomposing ASRangeControllerUpdateRangeProtocol+Beta.h such that the categories on various classes are defined in the classes themselves since that's where the implementation of those categories is provided.
* Updating unit tests and import other headers the tests took for granted. The tests could probably import the umbrella header and not have to worry about this.
* Updating the "Life without Cocoapods" sample to build and run dependent on ASDK as a static library.
* Added a "Life With Frameworks" sample app to build and run dependent on ASDK as a framework, proving the framework targets work.
* [ASCollectionView] Initial pass at reducing double-sided animations
* [ASCollectionView] Always suppress animation during node size requery
* [ASCollectionView] Rejigger the invalidation logic to support animated size changes
* [ASCollectionView] Remove unused header
* [ASCollectionView] Change comment
* [ASDataController] Remove unused variable
* [ASCollectionView] When relayout animated due to cell size change, wait until next layout pass
* [ASCollectionView] Invalidate layout synchronously
* [ASCollectionView] Only read the layout object once
* [ASCollectionView] When size changes, wait for requery before layout
* [ASCollectionView] Sort of go back to using an empty update to handle node resizing
* [ASCollectionView] Remove unused constant
* [ASCollectionView] Address PR comments
* [ASCollectionView] Prevent nested [super performBatchUpdates:] calls
This situation is relatively uncommon. If a user manually uses -[UIView addSubnode:], the convenience category method,
and then calls -[ASDisplayNode removeFromSuperview] -- we would bypass performing the actual removal as no supernode pointer
is set. After further consideration, the special handling here to support divergence between the supernode pointer and
the view / layer hierarchy is not something we need to maintain going forward, and removing it makes addressing this easy.
* [ASDataController] Add some assertions to clarify what queues things happen on
* [ASCollectionDataController] Optimize willReloadData
* [ASDataController] Minor optimizations, no functional changes
* [ASDataController] Always reload data on _editingTransactionQueue
* [ASDataController] Remove async data fetching option, deprecate callbacks
* [ASDataController] Not mutable
* [ASMultidimensionalArrayUtils] Use fast enumeration
* Optimize ASMultidimensionalArrayUtils
* Don't relayout as a result of clearing a traitCollection's context
I'm not completely sure this change is the best solution. Here is context:
An ASEnvironmentTraitCollection has a pointer to an optional context that an ASVC is the owner of. When the ASVC is dealloc'ed, we go through all subnodes of the VC and clear out the context so that the struct isn't holding on to a garbage pointer.
Setting the traitCollection on ASCollectionNode/ASTableNode causes the cells to relayout if the trait collection changed (this is a special case for these two nodes since their cells are not actually subnodes). Setting the context to nil registered as a trait collection change and was causing a layout even as we were dealloc'ing the VC.
The logic I'm implementing here is:
If the trait collection changed AND the displayContext did not, then we should relayout.
If the trait collection changed AND the new displayContext is non-nil then we should layout
In the case where the trait collection change was caused soley by the displayContext going from non-nil to nil, then we should NOT layout.
```
// At this point we know that the two traits collections are NOT equal for some reason
BOOL needsLayout = (oldTraits.displayContext == currentTraits.displayContext) || currentTraits.displayContext != nil;
```
Is there a better place/safer way to do this?
* removed extra setNeedsLayout call
* Fix some concurrency problems detected by Xcode 8's new Thread Sanitizer.
Some of these changes are arguably just to silence the warnings from Thread Sanitizer.
* Fix several memory leaks in the unit tests.
A number of the unit test source files are compield with `-fno-objc-arc`. This was clearly overlooked when writing several of the unit tests.
Fixed by (mostly) switching to use of `-autorelease` for the problem code.
NOTE: This commit doesn't fix all the memory leaks found. There's still at least one leak in `-[ASDisplayNodeTests testSetNeedsDataFetchImmediateState]`, and several leaks in `ASBasicImageDownloader.mm`. I wasn't able to find a trivial cause to these, unfortunately.
Currently within `ASCollectionView`, there is an assumption that there will always be a static number of supplementary views per section—even when additional items are added or removed from that section. This is evidenced by the fact that when you invoke -[ASCollectionView insertItemsAtIndexPaths:], the data source method -[ASCollectionDataSource collectionView:nodeForSupplementaryElementOfKind:atIndexPath:] is not invoked, preventing consumers from specifying a new number of supplementary nodes for the new set of items.
With this change, the set of supplementary nodes for a section is now recalculated not only on section-level mutations, but also on item-level mutations as well. This adds item-level counterparts to the section-level `-prepareFor...` subclassing hooks in `ASDataController+Subclasses.h` to make this possible.
This should fix#1278 and #1322
This has been tested in my project and seen to fix the assertion. Open to suggestions on how to test in a more universal way.
